Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Comparative Analysis of International Public Sector Accounting Standard 23 and International Accounting Standard 20

Authors: Papias Njaala;

Comparative Analysis of International Public Sector Accounting Standard 23 and International Accounting Standard 20

Abstract

International Public Sector Accounting Standard (IPSAS) 23: Revenue from Non-exchange Transactions (Taxes and Transfers) is an accounting standard used to account for taxes and transfers. They are applicable to public sector entities [except for Government Business Enterprises (GBEs)]. The standard is also not applicable to private sector entities. IAS 20: Accounting for Government Grants and Disclosure of Government Assistance is the counterparty accounting standard used in private sector (excluding the SMEs) and GBEs with more than 100 employees. Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) are required to apply a set of accounting standards known as International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) for SMEs.The purpose of this paper is to explore the main areas of differences between the IPSAS 23 and IAS 20 and suggest some improvements to them.This paper discusses the differences between IPSAS 23 and IAS 20 and suggests areas for improvement in both standards on recognition, presentation, and some disclosures.The methodology used in this paper is the comparative analysis of financial reporting requirements between IPSAS 23 and IAS 20. A desk work research has been conducted to thoroughly compare the two standards and suggest areas for improvement in both standards.The paper is beneficial to professional accountants as it provides the ‘gaps’ existing in the IPSAS 23 and IAS 20 and presenting improvements to plug the ‘gaps’. No similar attempts have been published hitherto in the financial reporting literature.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!