
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2713656
The requirement of 'consent' of the Advocate-General for initiating contempt proceedings arose in several cases. In the case under study, in a petition filed by a person for initiating appropriate contempt proceedings against the contemnor without the consent of the Advocate-General came up for consideration. This derogatory, defamatory and filthy statements made against a sitting judge. These aforesaid statements got wide media publicity, and constituted a straight and direct attack upon a sitting judge lowering the dignity of the judge and also the judicial system of the country. Affidavits were filed in support of the contempt case by the petitioner. The contempt petition was opposed on the grounds of its maintainability as it was filed without the consent of the Advocate-General.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
