
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2708623
This paper empirically constructs the fiscal performance index for Indian states by using nine separate indicators reflecting different dimensions of fiscal performance of the states. Finance Commissions also use fiscal performance for fund allocations but they use only single indicator based formula which is prone to inefficiency. There is a need for more sophisticated methods for assessing the fiscal performance more carefully. Present paper is an attempt to construct such an index to understand the public finance management of Indian states. My analysis suggests that Chandigarh and Tamilnadu are the best managers and Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat and Haryana have fairly good public finance management. On the other hand, West Bengal, Uttar Pradesh and Punjab are the worst managers.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
