
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2689731
handle: 10419/126606
In the post-crisis period, increased regulation of financial intermediaries has led to a significant decline in corporate bond market liquidity. In order to stabilize these bond markets, policy makers recently proposed that the trading of corporate bonds should be more centralized. In this paper, we show that a centralization of corporate bond markets generally leads to an inferior outcome when compared with the initial over-the-counter structure. The reason is that in a frictionless centralized secondary bond market, the demand for bonds increases by such a magnitude that the return on bonds decreases until equaling the return on money, and hence, the market becomes redundant.
G28, liquidity, ddc:330, monetary theory, corporate bonds, D62, E50, E44, D47, G11, G12, over-the-counter markets, financial regulation, D52, E31
G28, liquidity, ddc:330, monetary theory, corporate bonds, D62, E50, E44, D47, G11, G12, over-the-counter markets, financial regulation, D52, E31
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
