
pmid: 26854078
Assortative mechanisms can overcome tragedies of the commons that otherwise result in dilemma situations. Assortativity criteria include various forms of kin selection, greenbeard genes, and reciprocal behaviors, usually presuming an exogenously fixed matching mechanism. Here, we endogenize the matching process with the aim of investigating how assortativity itself, jointly with cooperation, is driven by evolution. Our main finding is that full-or-null assortativities turn out to be long-run stable in most cases, independent of the relative speeds of both processes. The exact incentive structure of the underlying social dilemma matters crucially. The resulting social loss is evaluated for general classes of dilemma games, thus quantifying to what extent the tragedy of the commons may be endogenously overcome.
Democratic consensus, cooperation, (co)-evolution, 1100 General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, (co, 2604 Applied Mathematics, 1300 General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, 2400 General Immunology and Microbiology, Applications of game theory, cooperation, (co-)evolution, assortativity, democratic consensus, Humans, 2613 Statistics and Probability, Social Behavior, 10095 Institute of Sociology, Assortativity, assortativity, Evolutionary games, 300 Social sciences, sociology & anthropology, democratic consensus, (co-)evolution, Social Support, Models, Theoretical, Cooperation, )evolution, Models of societies, social and urban evolution, 2611 Modeling and Simulation
Democratic consensus, cooperation, (co)-evolution, 1100 General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, (co, 2604 Applied Mathematics, 1300 General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, 2400 General Immunology and Microbiology, Applications of game theory, cooperation, (co-)evolution, assortativity, democratic consensus, Humans, 2613 Statistics and Probability, Social Behavior, 10095 Institute of Sociology, Assortativity, assortativity, Evolutionary games, 300 Social sciences, sociology & anthropology, democratic consensus, (co-)evolution, Social Support, Models, Theoretical, Cooperation, )evolution, Models of societies, social and urban evolution, 2611 Modeling and Simulation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 28 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
