
handle: 10419/123677
PurposeThis paper aims to assess the role of foreign aid in reducing the hypothetically negative impact of terrorism on trade using a panel of 78 developing countries with data for the period 1984-2008.Design/methodology/approachThe empirical evidence is based on interactive generalised method of moment estimations with forward orthogonal deviations. Bilateral, multilateral and total aid dynamics are used, whereas terrorism entails domestic, transnational, unclear and total terrorism dynamics.FindingsThe following findings have been established. First, while bilateral aid has no significant effect on trade, multilateral aid and total aid have positive impacts. Second total terrorism, domestic terrorism and transnational terrorism increase trade with increasing order of magnitude. Third, corresponding negative marginal effects on the interaction between foreign aid (bilateral and total) and terrorism display thresholds that are within range. Fourth, there is scant evidence of positive net effects. Overall, the findings broadly indicate that foreign aid is a necessary but not a sufficient policy tool for completely dampening the effects of terrorism on trade.Originality/valueThere is a growing policy interest in the relationship between terrorism and international development outcomes.
ddc:330, O40 - General, O40, F35 - Foreign Aid, Trade Openness, International Business, F23 - Multinational Firms, Development, Trade Openness, Foreign Aid; Terrorism; Development, Foreign Aid, F40 - General, Terrorism, F23, F35, F40, jel: jel:F40, jel: jel:F35, jel: jel:F23, jel: jel:O40
ddc:330, O40 - General, O40, F35 - Foreign Aid, Trade Openness, International Business, F23 - Multinational Firms, Development, Trade Openness, Foreign Aid; Terrorism; Development, Foreign Aid, F40 - General, Terrorism, F23, F35, F40, jel: jel:F40, jel: jel:F35, jel: jel:F23, jel: jel:O40
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 24 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
