
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2639087
handle: 10419/113786 , 10419/112780
This paper looks at the effect of the relatedness of two countries, measured by their genetic distance, on educational migrant selection. We analyze bilateral country-level education-specific migration stocks from 85 sending countries to the 15 main destination countries in 2000 and show that country pairs with larger genetic distances exhibit more selected migrant stocks compared to country pairs with smaller genetic distances on average. The effect is driven by country pairs with genetic distances above the median, suggesting that genetic distance must be sufficiently large to constitute a barrier to migration for low-skilled migrants. Results are robust to the inclusion of sending and destination country fixed effects, bilateral control variables, and an instrumental variables approach that exploits exogenous variation in genetic distances in the year 1500.
genetic distance, Genetic Distance, ddc:330, Z1, Culture, selection, culture, Z10, international migration, International Migration, J61, F22, Genetic Distance,International Migration,Selection,Culture, Selection, genetic distance, international migration, selection, culture, jel: jel:Z1, jel: jel:J61, jel: jel:F22, jel: jel:Z10
genetic distance, Genetic Distance, ddc:330, Z1, Culture, selection, culture, Z10, international migration, International Migration, J61, F22, Genetic Distance,International Migration,Selection,Culture, Selection, genetic distance, international migration, selection, culture, jel: jel:Z1, jel: jel:J61, jel: jel:F22, jel: jel:Z10
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
