
handle: 1721.1/109085
AbstractUsing account-level credit card data from six major commercial banks from January 2009 to December 2013, we apply machine-learning techniques to combined consumer tradeline, credit bureau, and macroeconomic variables to predict delinquency. In addition to providing accurate measures of loss probabilities and credit risk, our models can also be used to analyze and compare risk management practices and the drivers of delinquency across banks. We find substantial heterogeneity in risk factors, sensitivities, and predictability of delinquency across banks, implying that no single model applies to all six institutions. We measure the efficacy of a bank's risk management process by the percentage of delinquent accounts that a bank manages effectively, and find that efficacy also varies widely across institutions. These results suggest the need for a more customized approached to the supervision and regulation of financial institutions, in which capital ratios, loss reserves, and other parameters are specified individually for each institution according to its credit risk model exposures and forecasts.
Economics and Econometrics, Consumer finance, Credit card default model, Machine-learning, Credit risk, Finance, jel: jel:E51, jel: jel:E21, jel: jel:D12, jel: jel:G01, jel: jel:G21, jel: jel:D14, jel: jel:G17, jel: jel:D18
Economics and Econometrics, Consumer finance, Credit card default model, Machine-learning, Credit risk, Finance, jel: jel:E51, jel: jel:E21, jel: jel:D12, jel: jel:G01, jel: jel:G21, jel: jel:D14, jel: jel:G17, jel: jel:D18
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 171 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
