
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2615249
handle: 10419/111537 , 10419/101104 , 11858/00-001M-0000-002D-A22A-0 , 1814/29568
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2615249
handle: 10419/111537 , 10419/101104 , 11858/00-001M-0000-002D-A22A-0 , 1814/29568
AbstractWe experimentally examine the impact of tax evasion attempts on the performance of credence goods markets, where contractual incompleteness results from asymmetric information on the welfare maximizing quality of the goods. Our results suggest that tax evasion attempts – independently of whether they are successful or not – lead to efficiency losses in the form of too low quality and less frequent trade. Thus, shadow economies may reduce welfare not only by inducing agents to incur costs to hide or to uncover taxable transactions, by imposing risk on uncertainty-averse tax evaders and by distorting competition, but also by creating an additional efficiency loss in the underlying market by forfeiting possible gains from trade and by inducing insufficient quality provision. We call these the hidden costs of tax evasion.
Expert Services, tax evasion, H26, Tax evasion, tax evasion, expert services, credence goods, fraud, experiment, Credence goods, C72, Experiment, C91, Expert services, Tax Evasion, experiment, ddc:330, Fraud, expert services, D82, credence goods, Credence Goods, Expert Services, Tax Evasion, Fraud, Experiment, fraud, Credence Goods, jel: jel:D82, jel: jel:H26, jel: jel:C91, jel: jel:C72
Expert Services, tax evasion, H26, Tax evasion, tax evasion, expert services, credence goods, fraud, experiment, Credence goods, C72, Experiment, C91, Expert services, Tax Evasion, experiment, ddc:330, Fraud, expert services, D82, credence goods, Credence Goods, Expert Services, Tax Evasion, Fraud, Experiment, fraud, Credence Goods, jel: jel:D82, jel: jel:H26, jel: jel:C91, jel: jel:C72
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
