
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2602938
Academic criticism of classic Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) performance measures is not new. In particular, a number of authors have pointed out the shortcomings of using the Sharpe ratio for performance evaluation and the mean-variance framework for portfolio construction when the underlying investments have highly non-symmetric distributions. A number of hedge-fund strategies have asymmetric outcomes. This can be because they either explicitly use derivatives or because their return profile involves taking on some implicit short options risk.This article will briefly touch on the problems with using traditional performance evaluation methods and then will summarize the state-of-the-art in alternative performance evaluation techniques.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
