
handle: 10419/303373
AbstractCurrent account (CA) dispersion within European Union (EU) Member States has been increasing progressively since the 1990s. Interestingly, the persistent deficits in many peripheral countries have not been accompanied by a significant growth process able to stimulate a log run rebalancing as neoclassical theory predicts. To shed light on the issue, this paper investigates the determinants of EurozoneCAimbalances, focusing on the role played by financial integration. The analysis considers two samples of 22OECDand 15EUcountries, three time horizons corresponding to various steps in European integration, different control variables and several panel econometric methods. The results suggest that within theEUgroup of countries financial integration contributed to explain theCAdeterioration in the peripheral countries especially in the post‐EMUperiod creating an asymmetric behaviour within theEMU. From a financial stability perspective, this ‘divergence’ could hinder the effectiveness of monetary policy. By reducing the apparent benefits of participating in the monetary union, it also raises the risk of a break‐up.
EMU, core-periphery countries, ddc:330, F36, current account imbalances, financial integration, EMU, core-periphery countries, panel econometric models, current account imbalances, panel econometric models, F43, current accounts imbalances, financial integration, EMU, core-periphery countries, panel econometric models, financial integration, jel: jel:F43, jel: jel:F36
EMU, core-periphery countries, ddc:330, F36, current account imbalances, financial integration, EMU, core-periphery countries, panel econometric models, current account imbalances, panel econometric models, F43, current accounts imbalances, financial integration, EMU, core-periphery countries, panel econometric models, financial integration, jel: jel:F43, jel: jel:F36
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 133 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
