Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Triple Loop-Reflective Learning within Non-Governmental Health Organizations in Sub-Saharan Africa: An Organizational Learning Perspective

Authors: Heather Lynn Smith;

Triple Loop-Reflective Learning within Non-Governmental Health Organizations in Sub-Saharan Africa: An Organizational Learning Perspective

Abstract

For nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) providing health service delivery in Sub-Saharan Africa, prioritizing learning and adaption, has become a necessity as they operate in challenging and complex environments. Organizational learning within these NGOs is increasingly seen as fundamental to improving development performance and impact. However, exactly what the theory of organizational learning means and how it translates into practice remain uncertain. Confusion also exists among NGO practitioners concerning what type of learning environment is most beneficial. Furthermore, NGOs often operate within a customary learning culture that favors action over reflection. This situation poses barriers to learning and has an impact on the ability of all actors (e.g., the organization, collaborative partners, and stakeholders) to reflect collaboratively and envision change. Reflection or reflective learning, often synonymous with triple loop learning, generally involves a process in which all actors step back and reflect on their underlying assumptions and goals. This paper proposes that certain organizational aspects contribute to the realization of triple loop learning within health NGOs: (1) leadership commitment and involvement; (2) a knowledge sharing system that provides for feedback and reflection for those working in the field and at the headquarter level; and (3) sufficient staff and budget to harness knowledge.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!