
This study aims to investigate the changes that the prohibition of the non-audit services by section 201 of SOX brought in the relationship between the audit fees and non-audit fees. Both univariate and multivatiate regression methodologies has been used to test the hypotheses. Using both OLS and two-stage least squares, this study find a weak positive relationship between audit fees and non-audit fees. This result suggests that the companies need to pay an increased rate of both audit and non-audit fees after SOX. The findings of this paper will be the use of financial reporting regulatory authorities such as Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). It will also guide the researchers for future investigations. This study will be the one of the first to provide evidence on the changes in the relationship between audit and non-audit fees because of the Section 201 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
