
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2529413
This article examines the legal structure of complex structured finance transactions – notably collateralised debt obligation (CDO) – and explores in particular the regime of legal duties and liabilities designed to protect investors. The article critically assesses whether the existing law is adequate to hold to account the main actors involved in these transactions, namely SPV directors, trustees and asset managers. It also explores more specific avenues to establish accountability, namely the law of misrepresentation and fiduciary law. The analysis shows that in the context of structured transactions there remains an accountability problem due to the limited extent of the applicable duties, the nature of the conflicts of interest, the problematic disclosure (misrepresentation) of the transactions’ risks. The article contends that the complexity of the legal relationships underpinning CDOs and the resulting asymmetry of information between financial institutions on the one hand and investors on the other pushes for either a broader application of fiduciary obligations or alternatively a statutory redefinition of structured transactions.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
