
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2487071
The interaction of business with politics is a ‘big strategy’ (Whittington, 2012) phenomenon. Political activities of firms have consequences not only for firms, but also for democratic systems. But little is known about impact of corporate political activity on either firms or society. The many studies which have studied business politics interaction are overall inconclusive. In this essay we argue that the lack of understanding stems from inappropriate conceptualization and incorrect usage of corporate political activity as a theoretical concept. In this essay we argue that the understanding of corporate political participation can be improved by distinguishing between two related but distinct concepts: corporate political activity, and corporate political strategy. Denoting a set of activities as political activities is not as useful for Strategic Organization research as it may be in Sociology or Political Science. We argue that corporate political strategy might be a more useful conceptualization making political actions of corporations amenable to study in ways King & Walker (2014) called for.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
