
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2479488
This paper provides a preliminary analysis of the social media policies created in the Brazilian Judiciary and the experience of two Brazilian Courts (STF and STJ) in the use of social networks.We explain two different cases (STF on Twitter and STJ on Facebook) and describe the role of the National Council of Justice (CNJ) in regulating the subject. Our claim is that sociolegal scholars can engage in this research area and study the effectiveness of these policies, focusing on the potential to the democratization of the Judiciary.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
