
We examine whether Fitch support ratings of US banks depend on bank size. Using quarterly data for the period 2004:Q4 to 2012:Q4 and controlling for several factors that make large and small banks different, we find that bank size is positively related to support ratings. However, the effect is non-linear in line with the 'too-big-to-rescue' hypothesis. After the failure of Lehman Brothers and the passing of Dodd-Frank the relation between size and potential support has become stronger.
Risk, RISK, Holding companies, GOVERNMENT SUPPORT, RETURNS, Too-big-to-rescue, Fail, HOLDING COMPANIES, Government support, Diversification, FAIL, Too big, Bank size, DIVERSIFICATION, Too-big-too-fail, Returns, Support ratings, TOO BIG
Risk, RISK, Holding companies, GOVERNMENT SUPPORT, RETURNS, Too-big-to-rescue, Fail, HOLDING COMPANIES, Government support, Diversification, FAIL, Too big, Bank size, DIVERSIFICATION, Too-big-too-fail, Returns, Support ratings, TOO BIG
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
