
handle: 10419/100949
Since late 1993, nonfinancial corporations have used financial instruments that permit them to treat preferred-stock dividends as tax-deductible interest. Bank holding companies (BHCs), however, did not issue these trust-preferred securities (TPS) until 1996, when the Federal Reserve qualified them as Tier-1 capital. We delineate and test five, not mutually exclusive, hypotheses by: (1) analyzing the stock-market's reaction to the Fed's ruling and to TPS filings and (2) comparing BHCs that issued TPS with those that did not. We find that regulatory capital requirements, tax savings, and uninsured sources of funds had significant positive effects on BHCs' demand for capital and that the market responded favorably to TPS filings. Our event-study findings are contrary to prior empirical results in that we find a positive market reaction to equity offerings.
ddc:330, Bank supervision, Bank holding companies, Securities, Bank capital ; Bank holding companies ; Bank supervision ; Securities, Bank capital
ddc:330, Bank supervision, Bank holding companies, Securities, Bank capital ; Bank holding companies ; Bank supervision ; Securities, Bank capital
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 26 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
