
handle: 10419/129036 , 10419/122167 , 2440/107815
This paper presents a theoretical model and empirical evidence to explain the occurrence of tax amnesties. We treat amnesties as endogenous, resulting from a strategic game between many taxpayers discounting future payments from punishment and a government that balances costs and benefits of amnesty programs. From the model we derive hypotheses about the factors that should influence the occurrence of tax amnesties. To test these predictions empirically, we rely on amnesty information from US States between 1981 and 2011. In line with the theoretical model, our empirical findings suggest that the likelihood of amnesties is mainly driven by a government's fiscal requirements and the taxpayers' expectations on future amnesties.
ddc:330, tax evasion, Tax amnesties; strategic game; US states, Tax amnesties; Tax evasion, US states, tax amnesties, Tax amnesties, strategic game, jel: jel:H72, jel: jel:H11, jel: jel:H26
ddc:330, tax evasion, Tax amnesties; strategic game; US states, Tax amnesties; Tax evasion, US states, tax amnesties, Tax amnesties, strategic game, jel: jel:H72, jel: jel:H11, jel: jel:H26
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 33 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
