This Article calls into question the primary meaning of copyright\ud law. It argues that copyright is not primarily a legal instrument,\ud but rather a fundamental mode of human existence. The starting\ud point of the analysis is Kant’s definition of a book as a "public\ud address" and of author’s rights as ultimately being grounded in the\ud furtherance and maintenance of truth. Building on Kant’s argument,\ud the Article defines the copyright primary subject matter as the act of\ud speaking publicly in one’s own name, and the copyright sphere as the\ud author-public coalescence that such act of speaking generates. This\ud enables reaching a proper understanding of the scope of copyright\ud and to characterizing its specificity as compared to its "fellow rights,"\ud patents and trademarks