
In this paper, we propose a sensitivity‐based analysis to study the nonlinear behavior under nonexpected utility with probability distortions (or “distorted utility” for short). We first discover the “monolinearity” of distorted utility, which means that after properly changing the underlying probability measure, distorted utility becomes locally linear in probabilities, and the derivative of distorted utility is simply an expectation of the sample path derivative under the new measure. From the monolinearity property, simulation algorithms for estimating the derivative of distorted utility can be developed, leading to gradient‐based search algorithms for the optimum of distorted utility. We then apply the sensitivity‐based approach to the portfolio selection problem under distorted utility with complete and incomplete markets. For the complete markets case, the first‐order condition is derived and optimal wealth deduced. For the incomplete markets case, a dual characterization of optimal policies is provided; a solvable incomplete market example with unhedgeable interest rate risk is also presented. We expect this sensitivity‐based approach to be generally applicable to optimization problems involving probability distortions.
Incomplete market, probability distortion, 330, monolinearity, incomplete market, Monolinearity, Probability distortion, Portfolio selection, sensitivity-based optimization, Portfolio theory, Sensitivity-based optimization, portfolio selection, perturbation analysis, Perturbation analysis, Utility theory
Incomplete market, probability distortion, 330, monolinearity, incomplete market, Monolinearity, Probability distortion, Portfolio selection, sensitivity-based optimization, Portfolio theory, Sensitivity-based optimization, portfolio selection, perturbation analysis, Perturbation analysis, Utility theory
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 23 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
