
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2345622
Retail companies can employ a variety of return policies ranging from a no-questions-asked return policy to specifying a duration in which products can be returned. This duration is often termed as return period. The impact of return period length on product return volumes and their variability is not understood. This paper shows that increasing return period length results in reducing variability of product returns-- commonly known as risk pooling. Risk pooling in product returns by increasing return period length is structurally different from existing works on risk pooling. Commonly discussed risk pooling examples such as demand substitution, are accrual in nature where the behavior of underlying stochastic system does not alter. In the case of product returns, risk pooling occurs by changing customer behavior, which is a behavioral change in the underlying stochastic system. Additionally, the necessary conditions for behavioral change to result in additional risk pooling benefits are derived.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
