Downloads provided by UsageCounts
We empirically study the determinants of failures of microfinance institutions based on the CAMELS rating components and microfinance-specific measures by applying probit regression techniques. Our findings confirm the capital adequacy (C), the asset quality (A), the management capability (M), the earnings (E), and the sensitivity to market risk (S) as explaining factors of failures of microfinance institutions. Regarding microfinance-specific effects, there is a positive influence of the percentage of female borrowers on the likelihood of failure. Moreover, we find evidence that regulation, the presence of donations, and the rapid growth of an MFI affect the probability of failure.
microfinance, MFI failure, CAMELS, regulation, gender, ddc:330, 330 Wirtschaft, G21, G23, G32, L26
microfinance, MFI failure, CAMELS, regulation, gender, ddc:330, 330 Wirtschaft, G21, G23, G32, L26
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 80 | |
| downloads | 90 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts