<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
handle: 10197/7027 , 10197/5614
To mitigate potential contagion from future banking crises, the European Commission recently proposed a framework which would provide for the $\textit{bail-in}$ of bank creditors in the event of failure. In this study, we examine this framework retrospectively in the context of failed European banks during the global financial crisis. Empirical findings suggest that equity and subordinated bond holders would have been the main losers from the 535 billion euro impairment losses realized by failed European banks. Losses attributed to senior debt holders would, on aggregate, have been proportionally small, while no losses would have been imposed on depositors. Cross-country analysis, incorporating stress-tests, reveals a divergence of outcomes with subordinated debt holders wiped out in a number of countries, while senior debt holders of Greek, Austrian and Irish banks would have required bail-in.
Bank resolution; Bail-In; European bank failure; Global financial crisis; Impairment charges, Bank Resolution, Bail-In, European Bank Failure, Global Financial Crisis, Impairment Charges., Bank resolution, Impairment charges, Bail-In, Bail-in, 332, Global financial crisis, FOS: Economics and business, European bank failure, Quantitative Finance - General Finance, General Finance (q-fin.GN)
Bank resolution; Bail-In; European bank failure; Global financial crisis; Impairment charges, Bank Resolution, Bail-In, European Bank Failure, Global Financial Crisis, Impairment Charges., Bank resolution, Impairment charges, Bail-In, Bail-in, 332, Global financial crisis, FOS: Economics and business, European bank failure, Quantitative Finance - General Finance, General Finance (q-fin.GN)
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 86 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |