Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Professional Expertise and Board Diversity

Authors: Stephen Gray; John Nowland;

Professional Expertise and Board Diversity

Abstract

Boards of directors have received limited guidance about the types and diversity of professional expertise expected on corporate boards. This is because little is actually known about the expertise that exists on corporate boards. In this study, we categorize directors by 11 types of professional expertise and examine the diversity of professional expertise on corporate boards and implications for shareholder value. We find the most common types of professional expertise are business executives, accountants, bankers, scientists, lawyers and engineers. The primary determinants of professional expertise diversity are board size, industry and location, with certain types of professional expertise (academics, bankers, doctors, engineers and scientists) clustered in specific industries. Overall, we find no relationship between professional expertise diversity and firm value. However, we find evidence that shareholders benefit when firms limit their board diversity to a specific subset of professional expertise (lawyers, accountants, consultants, bankers and other CEOs). Our results suggest that further diversity beyond this subset is not in the best interests of shareholders.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!