
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2278839
handle: 10419/74538 , 2381/28760
We investigate the relationship between public and private enforcers introducing a more differentiated approach. In contrast to the existing literature, we take into account that the costs and benefits of detection and prosecution and, thus, the usefulness of each enforcement mode may change with a variation of the type of anticompetitive conduct. We define a set of parameters that determine the costs and benefits of both types to enforce the antitrust laws and discuss implications for European competition law and policy.
private enforcement, 330, ddc:330, K21, Competition policy,public enforcement,private enforcement,European Union, public enforcement, Competition policy, European Union, L40, jel: jel:L40, jel: jel:K21
private enforcement, 330, ddc:330, K21, Competition policy,public enforcement,private enforcement,European Union, public enforcement, Competition policy, European Union, L40, jel: jel:L40, jel: jel:K21
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 19 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
