
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2274286
A rationally inattentive agent processes information by balancing benefits and costs of attention (Sims [1998, 2003]). Predicting the agent’s behavior therefore requires a measure of her attention costs, but these costs can be dicult to identify as they incorporate hidden factors - such as time, eort and cognitive resources - that are not directly observable. In this paper, we identify attention costs by characterizing the implications of rational inattention for choices over opportunity sets, where the trade-o between benefits and costs are revealed by attitudes towards flexibility (Kreps [1979]) and temporal resolution of uncertainty (Kreps and Porteus [1978]). Exploiting this connection, we provide a procedure to elicit attention costs using willingness-to-pay data, and indicate how such data could be obtained in dynamic choice environments (e.g., consumption-saving problems) or generated in experimental settings.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
