
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2242457
handle: 10419/83318
The paper analyzes a two-factor credit risk model allowing to capture default and recovery rate variation, their mutual correlation, and dependence on various explanatory variables. At the same time, it allows computing analytically the unexpected credit loss. We propose and empirically implement estimation of the model based on aggregate and exposure level Moody’s default and recovery data. The results confirm existence of significantly positive default and recovery rate correlation. We empirically compare the unexpected loss estimates based on the reduced two-factor model with Monte Carlo simulation results, and with the current regulatory formula outputs. The results show a very good performance of the proposed analytical formula which could feasibly replace the current regulatory formula.
G28, ddc:330, credit risk, Basel II regulation, C51, recovery rates, credit risk, Basel II regulation, default rates, recovery rates, correlation, default rates, correlation, G20, jel: jel:C51, jel: jel:G20, jel: jel:G28
G28, ddc:330, credit risk, Basel II regulation, C51, recovery rates, credit risk, Basel II regulation, default rates, recovery rates, correlation, default rates, correlation, G20, jel: jel:C51, jel: jel:G20, jel: jel:G28
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
