
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2205335
Tiebout’s (1956) theory about redistribution of population and the bundle of public goods, ever since, has been a major reference for many of recent endeavors to explain spatial redistribution patterns in metropolitan areas. In this paper, based on Tiebout’s rationale and by proposing major modifications on how his hypothesis would work better, I developed a theory of metropolitan redistribution patterns that improves conceptualization of current residential patterns in metropolitan areas. The theory clarifies that households do not relocate to solely maximize their locational utility, but rather residential mobility across metropolitan areas is an outcome of continuous adjustments in consumption of housing services and location of residence over the course of households’ lifecycles. Based on this theory, the discussion section provides a monocentric conceptual model and a multi-centric GIS-based model of population redistribution patterns that to further verify the validity of the hypothesis.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
