
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2193877
The Korean separation and possible unification remains at the centre of the South Korean political agenda and is influencing International Relations on a global scale as well. Consequentially, the debate focuses mainly on security issues from an IR perspective. The question, however, how a Korean unification could actually be achieved in practical terms is underexposed. Economic and even more so social questions are usually ignored. This article highlights critically several social and economic aspects of the German unification and draws inferences to the Korean case. It will be shown that the German strategy, focussing on a quick political unification, while achieving social and economic unity later, is not feasible for the Koreas. In contrast, it is argued that South Korea needs to develop strategies to maintain North Korea’s stability and to pursue social and economic harmonization first, before a political unification actually becomes a possibility.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
