
AbstractLexicographically ordered sets of binary criteria provide a uniform measure of how concisely a preference can be represented and how efficiently an agent can make decisions. This measure leads to: (1) sharper conclusions about which preferences are easy to represent than the economics test of checking if a preference has a utility representation, (2) a generalization of the classical result that a preference has a utility representation if and only if it has a countable order-dense subset. Lexicographically ordered binary criteria can also generate preferences that strictly order every pair of bundles in $${\mathbb {R}}^{n}$$ R n and have utility representations, thus reconciling utility theory with behavioral theories that rule out indifference. Finally, the lexicographic method provides simple proofs that transitive orders can be extended to linear orders.
preference representation, Ordered sets, Szpilrajn's theorem, lexicographic utility, Individual preferences, Decision theory, injections from \(\mathbb{R}^n\) to \(\mathbb{R}\)
preference representation, Ordered sets, Szpilrajn's theorem, lexicographic utility, Individual preferences, Decision theory, injections from \(\mathbb{R}^n\) to \(\mathbb{R}\)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
