
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2188430
A popular methodology of studying spatial income inequality is analysis of beta-convergence (i.e. an inverse relationship between current income per capita and its initial level). Its widespread use is based on a belief that the economic growth theory predicts income convergence among economies (countries or regions within a country), and that beta-convergence suggests decreasing income inequality. This article demonstrates that these are nothing but myths; hence, analyzing of beta convergence cannot serve as an adequate methodology for studying and predicting the evolution of spatial income inequality.
spatial income inequality, convergence, economic growth, jel: jel:O40, jel: jel:D63, jel: jel:O11, jel: jel:O47
spatial income inequality, convergence, economic growth, jel: jel:O40, jel: jel:D63, jel: jel:O11, jel: jel:O47
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
