Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Aproximación No Tradicional a Los Flujos Internacionales de Conocimiento Colombiano (Non Traditional Approach to the Colombian Knowledge International Flows)

Authors: Jenny-Paola Lis-Gutiérrez;

Aproximación No Tradicional a Los Flujos Internacionales de Conocimiento Colombiano (Non Traditional Approach to the Colombian Knowledge International Flows)

Abstract

En este estudio se pretende establecer si, dadas las condiciones de investigacion y apropiacion de conocimiento en Colombia, el pais presenta dinamicas de captura (atraccion, retencion, importacion) o de fuga (expulsion, exportacion) de conocimiento, mediante el analisis de dos variables: colaboracion internacional en articulos academicos indexados en Scopus (1940-mayo de 2011), y el pais de origen de las revistas que difunden los trabajos colombianos indexados en Scopus (2000-mayo de 2011). Se corrobora la hipotesis de que a pesar de las deficientes condiciones de creacion de nuevo conocimiento y de la baja apropiacion de la ciencia, Colombia no es un importador neto (captura) de conocimiento y en algunos casos presenta exportaciones netas (expulsion, fuga), asociadas con la limitada capacidad de retencion de conocimiento en el territorio. This study is aimed at establishing if given the research condition and the appropriation of knowledge in Colombia, does the country present capture (attraction, retention, importation) or drain (expulsion, exportation) dynamics for knowledge? On the basis of the analysis of two variables: international collaboration in academic journals indexed in Scopus (1940-may up to 2011); and the country of origin of the magazines that spread out the Colombian works indexed in Scopus (1940-may up to 2011); the hypothesis that regardless of the new knowledge creation deficient conditions and the low science appropriation, Colombia is not a net knowledge importer (capture) and in some cases presents net exports (expulsion, drain), is confirmed, associated with the limited knowledge retention capacity of the territory.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!