
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2155612
handle: 10419/73834 , 10419/65383
Fiscal sustainability tests have largely ignored the institutional setting of fiscal policy making. Fiscal equalization schemes in federal states are one such institution. We examinewhether German state governments pursue sustainable fiscal policies taking intoaccount fiscal equalization transfers. Using panel data techniques we assess fiscal sustainability by investigating whether the debt-to-GDP-ratio has had a positive influence on the primary surplus (Bohn-model). Distinguishing between different measures of theprimary surplus we show that including/excluding fiscal transfers changes the results of the Bohn-model. While fiscal equalization transfers do render the fiscal policy of the states sustainable they also provide the states with incentives to increase government spending which, eventually, might render the entire equalization scheme politically unsustainable.
Nachhaltigkeit, ddc:330, Fiscal sustainability, institutions, fiscal equalization schemes, panel data, fiscal sustainability, Fiscal sustainability, panel data, Länderfinanzen, Finanzausgleich, fiscal sustainability, institutions, fiscal equalization schemes, panel data, fiscal equalization schemes, institutions, H77, Deutschland, H72, H62, C23, jel: jel:H62, jel: jel:C23, jel: jel:H72, jel: jel:H77
Nachhaltigkeit, ddc:330, Fiscal sustainability, institutions, fiscal equalization schemes, panel data, fiscal sustainability, Fiscal sustainability, panel data, Länderfinanzen, Finanzausgleich, fiscal sustainability, institutions, fiscal equalization schemes, panel data, fiscal equalization schemes, institutions, H77, Deutschland, H72, H62, C23, jel: jel:H62, jel: jel:C23, jel: jel:H72, jel: jel:H77
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
