
Abstract We implement a field experiment to study the impact of reminder messages on dental health prevention. Patients who are due to schedule a check-up receive no reminder, a neutral reminder postcard, or reminders including additional information on the benefits of prevention. Our results document a strong impact of reminders. Within one month after receiving a reminder, the fraction of patients who make a check-up appointment more than doubles. The effect declines slightly over time, but remains economically and statistically significant. Including additional information in the reminders does not significantly increase response rates relative to the neutral reminder. Finally, our data indicates that applying reminders repeatedly neither strengthens nor weakens their effects.
Zahnarztpraxis, memory limitations, Field Experiment, Reminders, Nudges, Memory Limitations, Prevention, Dental Health, Framing, C93, prevention, Attention, dental health, Dental Health, Reminders, framing, Gesundheitsvorsorge, ddc:330, I11, Prevention, Memory limitations, prevention, dental health, field experiment, nudges, reminders, memory limitations, framing, reminders, nudges, Health prevention, Field experiment, Nudges, field experiment, Memory Limitations, Reminder, Framing, D03, jel: jel:D03, jel: jel:C93, jel: jel:I11
Zahnarztpraxis, memory limitations, Field Experiment, Reminders, Nudges, Memory Limitations, Prevention, Dental Health, Framing, C93, prevention, Attention, dental health, Dental Health, Reminders, framing, Gesundheitsvorsorge, ddc:330, I11, Prevention, Memory limitations, prevention, dental health, field experiment, nudges, reminders, memory limitations, framing, reminders, nudges, Health prevention, Field experiment, Nudges, field experiment, Memory Limitations, Reminder, Framing, D03, jel: jel:D03, jel: jel:C93, jel: jel:I11
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 101 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
