
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2116599
During the last six years, the IACHR based in San Jose, Costa Rica, took additional steps to ensure compliance with its decisions. In that vein, in order to pursue this and other more covert goals, it devised a brand-new tool, known as 'conventionality control,' which bore some resemblance to the judicial review mechanism sketched out by the U.S. Supreme Court in the famous 'Marbury v. Madison' decision (1803). It also had more immediate historical connection with 'control of community law; exercised by the European Court of Justice sitting in Luxembourg. Conventionality control basically compels national judges to uphold both San Jose de Costa Rica Treaty provisions and Inter-American Court of Human Rights case law, giving the IACHR the upper hand in the interpretation of human rights throughout the Western Hemisphere.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
