
handle: 2158/863907
Abstract: Pricing pressure indices have recently been proposed as alternative screening devices for horizontal mergers involving differentiated products. We extend the concept of Upward Pricing Pressure (UPP) proposed by Farrell and Shapiro (2010) to two-sided markets. Examples of such markets are the newspaper market, where the demand for advertising is related to the number of readers, and the market for online search, where advertising demand depends on the number of users. The formulas we derive are useful for screening mergers among two-sided platforms. Due to the two-sidedness they depend on four sets of diversion ratios that can either be estimated using market-level demand data or elicited in surveys. In an application, we evaluate a hypothetical merger in the Dutch daily newspaper market. Our results indicate that it is important to take the two-sidedness of the market into account when evaluating UPP.
merger evaluation; two-sided markets; network effects; upward pricing pressure; UPP, 330, UPP, Merger evaluation; two-sided markets; network effects; UPP, Merger evaluation, Merger evaluation, two-sided markets, network effects, UPP., Merger evaluation;two-sided markets;network effects;UPP, two-sided markets, network effects, jel: jel:L40, jel: jel:L82, jel: jel:L13
merger evaluation; two-sided markets; network effects; upward pricing pressure; UPP, 330, UPP, Merger evaluation; two-sided markets; network effects; UPP, Merger evaluation, Merger evaluation, two-sided markets, network effects, UPP., Merger evaluation;two-sided markets;network effects;UPP, two-sided markets, network effects, jel: jel:L40, jel: jel:L82, jel: jel:L13
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 50 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
