
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2085233
handle: 10419/303332
The collapse of Lehman Brothers in 2008 ushered in a financial crisis whose ramifications are\ud still being felt. Within the EU, collapse not only led to a change in regulatory rhetoric,\ud emphasising the need to secure the stability of EU money markets, but also to a significant\ud widening and deepening of technocratic supervisory structures for European financial\ud services. This paper accordingly investigates the newly established European System for\ud Financial Supervision and, in particular, semi-autonomous EU agencies for banking,\ud insurance and securities, for its ability to provide robust regulation and supervision within\ud Europe. However, it analyses this increase in technocratic governance at supranational level\ud in light of the worrying question of whether it has undermined capacity for political action\ud within Europe. At a time when readily-apparent failings in established technocratic\ud governance in Europe (monetary union) have led only to more technocratisation (proposed\ud fiscal union), perhaps to the point of systemic collapse, the general European trend to expertled\ud and evidence-based supervision must be doubted; not simply because it has failed on its\ud own terms, but also because it has established a technology of expertise, or dominant\ud rationality, which further encourages abdication of political responsibility for economic crisis.
ddc:330, Law, jel: jel:G3, jel: jel:F3
ddc:330, Law, jel: jel:G3, jel: jel:F3
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 20 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
