
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2050316
handle: 10419/57954
Assessing exchange rate misalignment is not an easy task. With reference to the debate on the value of China's currency, the renminbi (RMB), this article highlights a few challenges in properly assessing the extent of currency misalignment. The results derived from the fundamental equilibrium exchange rate (FEER) approach and the Penn effect regression are used to illustrate the sensitivity of misalignment estimate to assumptions of the key parameters in a given model, sampling uncertainty, serial correlation adjustment, and data revision. It is shown that both the sign and the magnitude of a misalignment estimate could be dramatically affected by these factors.
FEER, Penn effect, sampling uncertainty, serial correlation, data revision, ddc:330, FEER, serial correlation, data revision, Penn effect, F41, sampling uncertainty, F31, jel: jel:F31, jel: jel:F41
FEER, Penn effect, sampling uncertainty, serial correlation, data revision, ddc:330, FEER, serial correlation, data revision, Penn effect, F41, sampling uncertainty, F31, jel: jel:F31, jel: jel:F41
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
