
handle: 10419/58540 , 10419/59024
People gain utility from occupying a higher ranked position in the income distribution of the reference group. This paper investigates whether these gains depend on an individual’s set of non-cognitive skills. Using the 2000-2008 waves of the German Socioeconomic Panel dataset (SOEP), a subjective question on Life Satisfaction, and three different sets of non-cognitive skills indicators, we find significant and robust differences across skills groups. People who are more neurotic, extravert and have low external locus of control and low negative reciprocity are more sensitive to their individual position in the economic ladder. By contrast, the Life Satisfaction reaction to changes in economic status is significantly lower among individuals who score high (low) in negative (positive) reciprocity, and are at the bottom of the distribution of neuroticism, extraversion. The heterogeneity on the importance of income comparisons needs to be taken into account when, for example, introducing them into economic models, predicting individuals’ behaviour, or making welfare judgments.
ddc:330, Nutzen, Sozialer Status, Zufriedenheit, D62, Einkommensverteilung, Persönlichkeitspsychologie, personality traits, life satisfaction, income comparisons, personality traits, Life satisfaction, income comparisons, personality traits, I31, Deutschland, life satisfaction, income comparisons, Schätzung, jel: jel:D62, jel: jel:I31
ddc:330, Nutzen, Sozialer Status, Zufriedenheit, D62, Einkommensverteilung, Persönlichkeitspsychologie, personality traits, life satisfaction, income comparisons, personality traits, Life satisfaction, income comparisons, personality traits, I31, Deutschland, life satisfaction, income comparisons, Schätzung, jel: jel:D62, jel: jel:I31
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 10 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
