
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2013694
Using a broad sample of multiple commodity-inputs industries over the period of 1994-2008, the paper investigates the determinants for corporate decisions to commodity hedge and for the extent of hedging separately. Consistent with the literature, I find that firms are more likely to hedge when they are big, have risk management department set up and have more of their competitors hedge. I also find that firms change dynamically from non-hedgers to hedgers when their financial conditions improve. Furthermore, the paper investigates what determines the extent of hedging conditional on hedging and the cross-sectional and time series deviation of their hedge ratios. I find that firms with high-risk-preference CEOs tend to hedge less, are more likely to respond to past commodity price growth and to hedge differently from the industry average. Contrary to the general literature, the paper provides evidence that firms make decisions to hedge and to the extent of hedging based on distinct factors. The main determinants for the decisions to hedge are firms’ financial conditions, while the main determinants for the extent to hedge are CEO’s risk preferences.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
