
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2002129
A popular view in Russian studies argues that underdevelopment of Russian civil society is partly responsible for the failure of liberal idea in Russia. The fragmented society may see no alternative to massive government regulation, which is why support for a strong state is so high. If this logic is true, the differences in civicness across urban societies should show up in different levels of liberal parties' support. The paper estimates this effect. It was found that the transition from the most passive urban society to the most active in the sample increases the vote for liberal parties by a third. A unit increase in the number of consumer cooperatives per 1000 of citizens leads to a 3.5% drop in Communist Party results in 1995 and a 4% drop in United Russia votes in 2007. To demonstrate the causality we instrument the development of civil society by the number of years since the foundation of the first university in each city.
social capital, political accountability, regulation, Russia, jel: jel:D70, jel: jel:R10, jel: jel:Z10
social capital, political accountability, regulation, Russia, jel: jel:D70, jel: jel:R10, jel: jel:Z10
| citations The total number of citations received by all articles of the researcher of interest. | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
