
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1992922
handle: 11245/1.372074 , 11245/1.408599
EU law has broadened the scope of administrative sanctioning by adding a variety of sanctions to the palette of sanctions in national law. Since the coming into force of the Charter, EU procedural standards are modelled on the ‘criminal charge’ case law of the ECtHR. These standards are discussed below, and the question of whether the ECtHR and the CJ will agree on the qualification of certain EU sanctions as not criminal in nature is raised. The difference in the Court’s approach of reparatory and punitive sanctions with regard to procedural guarantees is gradual and in line with the ECtHR’s case law allowing a procedure that is not as strict provided the sanction concerns a ‘light’ criminal charge. The Charter contains specific guarantees in ‘criminal proceedings’. It is argued that, as a consequence, the CJ needs to clear up to which sanctions these guarantees apply.
340, 330
340, 330
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
