
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1992325
handle: 10419/55351
The stylized facts suggest a negative relationship between tax progressivity and the skill premium from the early 1960s until the early 1990s, and a positive one thereafter. They also generally imply rising tax progressivity, except for the 1980s. In this paper, we ask whether optimal tax policy is consistent with these observations, taking into account the demographic and technological factors that have also affected the skill premium. To this end, we construct a dynamic general equilibrium model in which the skill premium and the progressivity of the tax system are endogenously determined, with the latter being optimally chosen by a benevolent government. We find that optimal policy delivers both a progressive tax system and model predictions which are generally consistent, except for the 1980s, with the stylized facts relating to the skill premium and progressivity. To capture the patterns in the data over the 1980s requires that we adopt a government policy which is biased towards the interests of skilled agents. Thus, in addition to demographic and technological factors, changes in the preferences of policy-makers appear to be a potentially important factor in determining the evolution of the observed skill premium.
Steuerpolitik, ddc:330, Bildungsertrag, skill premium, optimal tax policy, government preferences, government preferences, Optimale Besteuerung, skill premium, optimal tax policy, J31, E62, Steuerprogression, Theorie, USA, E65, jel: jel:E62, jel: jel:E65, jel: jel:J31
Steuerpolitik, ddc:330, Bildungsertrag, skill premium, optimal tax policy, government preferences, government preferences, Optimale Besteuerung, skill premium, optimal tax policy, J31, E62, Steuerprogression, Theorie, USA, E65, jel: jel:E62, jel: jel:E65, jel: jel:J31
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
