
handle: 10419/58580
AbstractWe analyze the impact of profit sharing on training intensity. Profit sharing may affect training because it is a credible commitment by firms to reward firm‐specific skills, may reduce turnover and leads to peer group pressure to participate in training courses. To eliminate possible selectivity effects, we combine matching with difference‐in‐differences. We identify the proportion of employees participating in profits and differentiate profit sharing according to the percentage of the workers covered. Using German establishment data we find that profit sharing only has a significant effect on training intensity if the majority of the workforce benefits from it.
training, ddc:330, Bildungsverhalten, profit sharing, training, matching, J33, M52, matching, Weiterbildung, J24, Bildungsertrag, profit sharing, C14, Erfolgsbeteiligung, Deutschland, Schätzung, jel: jel:C14, jel: jel:J24, jel: jel:J33, jel: jel:M52
training, ddc:330, Bildungsverhalten, profit sharing, training, matching, J33, M52, matching, Weiterbildung, J24, Bildungsertrag, profit sharing, C14, Erfolgsbeteiligung, Deutschland, Schätzung, jel: jel:C14, jel: jel:J24, jel: jel:J33, jel: jel:M52
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
