
This paper discusses the Condorcet paradox within a strategic bargaining model with majority voting, exogenous recognition probabilities, and no discounting. The analysis employs the concepts of bargaining power, risk coefficient and perfect equilibrium. It is shown that stationarity of subgames perfect equilibria ensure agreement within finite expected time and that, for generic parameter values, SSPEs are unique and exclude Condorcet cycles.
Economics and Econometrics, SDG 16 - Peace, majority rule, public economics ;, INFORMATION, Decision theory, C73, D72, Voting theory, VOTING MODELS, CORE, Condorcet-Paradoxon, Verhandlungstheorie, C78, INTRANSITIVITIES, strategic bargaining, ddc:330, Consistent Subgame Perfect Equilibrium, Rent-seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior; [Stochastic and Dynamic Games; Evolutionary Games; Repeated Games; Bargaining Theory; Matching Theory; Political Processes], Condorcet Paradox, Risikoaversion, Risk Aversion, Justice and Strong Institutions, Neue politische Ökonomie, BARGAINING MODEL, Stochastic games, stochastic differential games, Condorcet paradox, STOCHASTIC GAMES, NOWHERE DENSENESS, Bargaining, Condorcet Paradox, Consistent Subgame Perfect Equilibrium, Risk Aversion, Compromise Prone, Bargaining, PERFECT EQUILIBRIUM, Social Sciences (miscellaneous), Compromise Prone, MAJORITY-RULE, jel: jel:C73, jel: jel:D72, jel: jel:C78
Economics and Econometrics, SDG 16 - Peace, majority rule, public economics ;, INFORMATION, Decision theory, C73, D72, Voting theory, VOTING MODELS, CORE, Condorcet-Paradoxon, Verhandlungstheorie, C78, INTRANSITIVITIES, strategic bargaining, ddc:330, Consistent Subgame Perfect Equilibrium, Rent-seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior; [Stochastic and Dynamic Games; Evolutionary Games; Repeated Games; Bargaining Theory; Matching Theory; Political Processes], Condorcet Paradox, Risikoaversion, Risk Aversion, Justice and Strong Institutions, Neue politische Ökonomie, BARGAINING MODEL, Stochastic games, stochastic differential games, Condorcet paradox, STOCHASTIC GAMES, NOWHERE DENSENESS, Bargaining, Condorcet Paradox, Consistent Subgame Perfect Equilibrium, Risk Aversion, Compromise Prone, Bargaining, PERFECT EQUILIBRIUM, Social Sciences (miscellaneous), Compromise Prone, MAJORITY-RULE, jel: jel:C73, jel: jel:D72, jel: jel:C78
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 15 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
