
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1822333
handle: 10419/60958
Banks’ leverage choices represent a delicate balancing act. Credit discipline argues for more leverage, while balance-sheet opacity and ease of asset substitution argue for less. Meanwhile, regulatory safety nets promote ex post financial stability, but also create perverse incentives for banks to engage in correlated asset choices and to hold little equity capital. As a way to cope with these distorted incentives, we outline a two-tier capital framework for banks. The first tier is a regular core capital requirement that helps deter excessive risk-taking incentives. The second tier, a novel aspect of our framework, is a special capital account that limits risk taking but preserves creditors’ monitoring incentives.
Bank assets ; Credit ; Bank capital ; Banks and banking - Regulations ; Systemic risk, ddc:330, Bankenaufsicht, Fremdkapital, Assets (Accounting) ; Risk management ; Bank capital ; Bank supervision, capital requirements, Bank, capital requirements; leverage; market discipline; model risk; systemic risk, systemic risk, Risiko, G21, G12, leverage, Kapitalstruktur, jel: jel:G12, jel: jel:G21
Bank assets ; Credit ; Bank capital ; Banks and banking - Regulations ; Systemic risk, ddc:330, Bankenaufsicht, Fremdkapital, Assets (Accounting) ; Risk management ; Bank capital ; Bank supervision, capital requirements, Bank, capital requirements; leverage; market discipline; model risk; systemic risk, systemic risk, Risiko, G21, G12, leverage, Kapitalstruktur, jel: jel:G12, jel: jel:G21
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 15 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
