
handle: 10419/89093
This paper estimates the impact of relative price volatility on sector-level investment allocation using a panel of 65 countries with data for 26 manufacturing industries over the period 1985-2003. Results indicate that volatility distorts efficient investment allocation in that investment is not necessarily devoted to relatively more productive sectors, especially in emerging market economies that are highly exposed and may lack the necessary institutions to deal with it successfully. This is evidence in support of theories suggesting that relative price volatility provides incentives for entrepreneurs to adopt more malleable but less productive production technologies, enabling them to accommodate more easily abrupt and frequent changes in relative prices, but at the cost of using less productive technologies.
O31, ddc:330, Emerging markets, Sector-level TFP, Relative price volatility, Investment allocation, Financial crises, Emerging markets, Malleable technologies, Sector-level TFP, Financial crises, Financial Crises & Structural Adjustement, Investment, Business Development, IDB-WP-208, Malleable technologies, Financial Crises & Economic Stabilization, Investment, Business Development, IDB-WP-208, E22, D24, L60, Investment allocation, Relative price volatility, jel: jel:E22, jel: jel:D24, jel: jel:L60, jel: jel:O31
O31, ddc:330, Emerging markets, Sector-level TFP, Relative price volatility, Investment allocation, Financial crises, Emerging markets, Malleable technologies, Sector-level TFP, Financial crises, Financial Crises & Structural Adjustement, Investment, Business Development, IDB-WP-208, Malleable technologies, Financial Crises & Economic Stabilization, Investment, Business Development, IDB-WP-208, E22, D24, L60, Investment allocation, Relative price volatility, jel: jel:E22, jel: jel:D24, jel: jel:L60, jel: jel:O31
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 14 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
