
handle: 10419/89154
This paper studies three horizontal policy instruments and two vertical ones in Chilean industrial policy, particularly regarding small and medium enterprises (SMEs). The horizontal instruments are (1) a guarantee program for borrowing by SMEs (FOGAPE), (2) a small subsidy to new exports that was applied from 1985 through 2003, and (3) the innovation subsidies provided by the Corporación de Fomento de la Producción (CORFO). The vertical policy instruments are the activities of Fundación Chile (FCh), a semi-public entrepreneur cum venture capitalist, and a CORFO program to attract foreign direct investment in information technology. Although most programs are well designed, they are numerous and insufficiently funded; Chile could benefit from a prioritization of needs and consolidation of these programs. Moreover, the instruments for making strategic bets on new sectors are particularly weak. In particular, FCh needs to refocus its activities on high-risk projects with long payoffs, something it cannot do with its small endowment.
Industrial policy, Small and medium enterprises, Chile, Industrial policy, ddc:330, L52, Economic Development & Growth, Industrial Policy, SME, Microbusinesses & Microfinance, Economic Development & Growth, Industrial Policy, Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises, Microbusinesses & Microfinance, F43, Small and medium enterprises, Chile, jel: jel:F43, jel: jel:L52, jel: jel:O15, jel: jel:O25
Industrial policy, Small and medium enterprises, Chile, Industrial policy, ddc:330, L52, Economic Development & Growth, Industrial Policy, SME, Microbusinesses & Microfinance, Economic Development & Growth, Industrial Policy, Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises, Microbusinesses & Microfinance, F43, Small and medium enterprises, Chile, jel: jel:F43, jel: jel:L52, jel: jel:O15, jel: jel:O25
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 19 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
