
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1814042
handle: 10419/153769
The 2007-2010 financial crisis highlighted the central role of financial intermediaries’ stability in buttressing a smooth transmission of credit to borrowers. While results from the years prior to the crisis often cast doubts on the strength of the bank lending channel, recent evidence shows that bank-specific characteristics can have a large impact on the provision of credit. We show that new factors, such as changes in banks’ business models and market funding patterns, had modified the monetary transmission mechanism in Europe and in the US prior to the crisis, and demonstrate the existence of structural changes during the period of financial crisis. Banks with weaker core capital positions, greater dependence on market funding and on non-interest sources of income restricted the loan supply more strongly during the crisis period. These findings support the Basel III focus on banks’ core capital and on funding liquidity risks. They also call for a more forwardlooking approach to the statistical data coverage of the banking sector by central banks. In particular, there should be a stronger focus on monitoring those financial factors that are likely to influence the functioning of the monetary transmission mechanism particularly in a period of crisis.
Geldpolitik, ddc:330, Welt, monetary policy, Finanzkrise, bank lending channel, financial innovation, monetary policy, Finanzprodukt, Geldpolitische Transmission, financial innovation, Kreditgeschäft, E44, bank lending channel, Finanzintermediation, E51, E52, Finanzmarktregulierung, bank lending channel, monetary policy, financial innovation
Geldpolitik, ddc:330, Welt, monetary policy, Finanzkrise, bank lending channel, financial innovation, monetary policy, Finanzprodukt, Geldpolitische Transmission, financial innovation, Kreditgeschäft, E44, bank lending channel, Finanzintermediation, E51, E52, Finanzmarktregulierung, bank lending channel, monetary policy, financial innovation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 30 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
